Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Combat Aircraft Berbasis Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process
Keywords:
AHP, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Penentuan Pesawat Tempur
Abstract
Pemilihan alutsista TNI khususnya Pesawat tempur secara tepat, efektif dan efisien mempengaruhi kekuatan dan kesiapan TNI AU dalam menegakkan kedaulatan negara di udara. Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut, TNI membutuhkan suatu aplikasi yang dapat mendukung pengambilan keputusan untuk sistem pemilihan Combat Aircraft dengan menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Metode ini menggunakan teknik desain eksperimental untuk menetapkan bobot atributnya dan kemudian mengoperasionalkan metode yang ada untuk membangun model pengambilan keputusan. Model ini merupakan aplikasi praktis dapat membantu dalam membuat keputusan yang obyektif tanpa memerlukan keterampilan khusus.
References
P. Wang, Z. Zhu, and Y. Wang, “A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW , TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design,” vol. 345, pp. 27–45, 2016.
Turban, Efraim; Aronson, Jay; Liang Peng Ting. 2005. Decision Support Systems and Intellegent Systems. New Jersey : Pearson Education, Inc.
Administration, “Comparison of AHP and Fuzzy AHP Methods for Human Resources in Science Technology ( HRST ) Performance Index Selection,” pp. 792–796, 2013.
M. V. T. Lokare, “Using the AHP and TOPSIS methods for Decision Making In Best Course Selection after HSC,” 2016.
Kusumadewi, S (2006), Fuzzy Multi-Atribut Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM), Graha Ilmu.Yogyakarta
J. Wang, K. Fan, Y. Su, S. Liang, and W. Wang, “Air Combat Effectiveness Assessment of Military Aircraft Using a Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methodology,” pp. 655–662, 2008.
R. E. Stok and R. Yustina, “Penerapan Multi-Criteria Decision Making Dalam,” pp. 1–12.
Stanujkic, B. Ðordevi ´ c, M. Ðordevi ´ c, Comparative analysis of some prominent mcdm methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks, Serb. J. Manage. 8 (2013) 213–241.
Gu, B.F. Song, Study on effectiveness evaluation of weapon systems based on grey relational analysis and TOPSIS, J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 20 (2009) 106–111.
Yoon, K.P dan Hwang, C.L (1995), Multiple attribute decision making; An Introduction, Sage Publications, United States of America.
Wang, Z. Zhu, and Y. Wang, “A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW , TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design,” vol. 345, pp. 27–45, 2016.
Montgomery C, Douglas. 2005. Design and Analysis of Experiments edition, New York : John Wiley and Sons
Jadhav and R. Sonar, “Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ), Weighted Scoring Method ( WSM ), and Hybrid Knowledge Based System ( HKBS ) for Software Selection : A Comparative Study,” pp. 991–997, 2009.
Turban, Efraim; Aronson, Jay; Liang Peng Ting. 2005. Decision Support Systems and Intellegent Systems. New Jersey : Pearson Education, Inc.
Administration, “Comparison of AHP and Fuzzy AHP Methods for Human Resources in Science Technology ( HRST ) Performance Index Selection,” pp. 792–796, 2013.
M. V. T. Lokare, “Using the AHP and TOPSIS methods for Decision Making In Best Course Selection after HSC,” 2016.
Kusumadewi, S (2006), Fuzzy Multi-Atribut Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM), Graha Ilmu.Yogyakarta
J. Wang, K. Fan, Y. Su, S. Liang, and W. Wang, “Air Combat Effectiveness Assessment of Military Aircraft Using a Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methodology,” pp. 655–662, 2008.
R. E. Stok and R. Yustina, “Penerapan Multi-Criteria Decision Making Dalam,” pp. 1–12.
Stanujkic, B. Ðordevi ´ c, M. Ðordevi ´ c, Comparative analysis of some prominent mcdm methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks, Serb. J. Manage. 8 (2013) 213–241.
Gu, B.F. Song, Study on effectiveness evaluation of weapon systems based on grey relational analysis and TOPSIS, J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 20 (2009) 106–111.
Yoon, K.P dan Hwang, C.L (1995), Multiple attribute decision making; An Introduction, Sage Publications, United States of America.
Wang, Z. Zhu, and Y. Wang, “A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW , TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design,” vol. 345, pp. 27–45, 2016.
Montgomery C, Douglas. 2005. Design and Analysis of Experiments edition, New York : John Wiley and Sons
Jadhav and R. Sonar, “Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ), Weighted Scoring Method ( WSM ), and Hybrid Knowledge Based System ( HKBS ) for Software Selection : A Comparative Study,” pp. 991–997, 2009.
Published
2021-01-26
How to Cite
Wibowo, A., & Infantono, A. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Combat Aircraft Berbasis Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process. Akademi Angkatan Udara Journal of Defense Science and Technology : AAU-JDST, 5(2), 133-142. Retrieved from https://aau.e-journal.id/jdst/article/view/45
Issue
Section
Articles
