Schedule Planning and Maintenance Activities Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Boeing 737-500 Aircraft With Reliability Method

  • Ferry Setiawan S1 Teknik Dirgantara Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Kedirgantaraan
  • Yustina Titin Purwantiningsih Prodi Teknik Aeronautika Pertahanan, Akademi Angkatan Udara, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Dhimas Wicaksono S1 Teknik Dirgantara Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Kedirgantaraan
Keywords: Failure, Reliability, Weibull Distribution, Maintenance Scheduled

Abstract

This study aims to plan effective maintenance schedules and activities on the auxiliary
power unit system so that there will be no more failures or unplanned or sudden damage. Failures in auxiliary power unit equipment often occur in several work systems, namely electrical systems, lubrication systems and Ignition systems, where this causes considerable losses for airlines. This research method uses qualitative and quantitative approaches, qualitative analysis uses the Failure Mode Effect and Critically Analysis (FMECA) method by analyzing the factors causing failure and the effects of failure, with the results of the causes of failure in several auxiliary power unit (APU) work systems as follows: the following electrical system is on the Relay start component, the Lubrication System is on the Oil Filter component, the Ignition System is on the igniter plug. From the results of the FMECA analysis, a quantitative analysis was carried out with the analysis carried out using the reliability method, the reliability parameter was calculated by the Weibull probability distribution, to determine the critical limit of the operational time of the component or system part which is the reliability limit of an auxiliary power unit system. The critical operational limit for the electrical system is 434 flight hours, the lubrication system is 1186 flight hours, and the Ignition system is 1610 flight hours, then these results are used to determine an effective maintenance schedule supported by planning the right maintenance activities to eliminate the causes - cause of failure in auxiliary power unit equipment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ilham, “Lubrication System Pada Auxiliary Power Unit ( Apu ),” Lubr. Syst. Pada Aux. Power Unit ( Gtc P85 129 Pesawat Boeing 737 300/400/500, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2016. C. E. Ebeling, “Intro to Reliability & Maintainability Engineering.” p. 486, 1997.

W. Zimmer, “An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering,” J. Qual. Technol., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 464–466, 1999, doi: 10.1080/00224065.1999.11979954.

F. Setiawan, E. Sofyan, and D. M. C. Putra, “Analisis Reliability Sistem Starter Valve Untuk Merencanakan Aktivitas Maintenance Pada Pesawat Boeing 737 Next Generation Di …,” Tek. STTKD J. Tek. …, vol. 6, no. 02, pp. 92–103, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.sttkd.ac.id/index.php/ts/article/view/272.

Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM). Rev 15 Oktober 2019. ATA 80 Engine Starting. Chicago Amerika. Boeing 737-600/700/800/900.

Cyrilus. (2012). Analisis Terhadap Starter Motor Auxiliary Power Unit 85 / 129E Saat on Pada Pesawat Boeing 737-300 / Pk-Yvw. Analisis Terhadap Starter Motor Auxiliary Power Unit 85/129E Saat on Pada Pesawat Boeing 737, 2(2),15–18

Mesra, T., & Amanda, R. (2018). Maintenance Pompa Reciprocating 211 / 212 Pm-4 a / B Menggunakan Metode Rcm Di Pt Pertamina (Persero) Refinery Unit Ii Dumai. 3814, 175–183.

Opocenska, H., & Hammer, M. (2016). Reliability centred maintenance. MM Science Journal,2016(NOVEMBER),1451–1455.

Rasindyo, M. R., Kusmaningrum, & Helianty, Y. (2015). Analisis Kebijakan Perawatan Mesin Cincinnati Dengan Menggunakan Metode Reliability Centered Maintenance Di PT. Dirgantara Indonesia. Jurnal Online Institut Teknologi Nasional, 03(1), 400–410.

Nasution, S., & Razali. (2019). Analisa Kegagalan Cylinder Head Mesin Diesel Komatsu dengan Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMECA) Dimegapower PLTD Bengkalis. 2012, 236–242.

Djunaidi, M., & Ryantaffy, A. K. (2018). Analisis Nonconforming Part pada Wing Structure Pesawat Cn-235 Dengan Menggunakan Metode FMEA (Failure Mode Effect Analysis). Jurnal Teknik Industri, 13(2), 67.

Angelina S. 2016. Lifetime Prediction Dari Honeywell Brake Akibat Pembebanan Pada Pesawat Boeing 737 Next Generation di PT GMF AeroAsia. Surabaya. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November

Smith A. 1992. Reliability Centered Maintenance. US Amerika. The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Waroy M, Budiarto U dan Kiryanto. 2016. Analisa Perawatan Berbasis Kehandalan Pada Fuel Oil System KM. Bukit Siguntang Dengan Metode Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM). Semarang. Universitas Diponegoro.

Wirardi A. 2019. Studi Kasus Penentuan Interval Waktu Optimum Perbaikan Komponen Precooler Pesawat Bombardier CRJ 1000 Menggunakan Metode Reliability Centered Maintenance Di PT GMF AeroAsia. Bandung. Universitas Nurtanio (UNNUR)

Nugraha, Furqon Gilang. 2017. “Evaluasi Reliability Engine Fuel and Control Pada Pesawat Boeing 737-800 Garuda Indonesia di PT. GMF Aeroasia Cengkareng.” Skripsi. Surabaya: ITS.

Gupita, S. A. N. (2016). Lifetime Prediction dari Honeywell Brake akibat Pembebanan pada Pesawat BOEING 737- NG di PT. GMF AEROASIA. 6. 1-34.

Kurniawan, F. (2013). Manajemen Perawatan Industri. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Susanto, B. S. P. (2017). Penjadwalan Waktu Optimum Maintenance Dengan Metode Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM). Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Published
2021-12-21
How to Cite
Setiawan, F., Purwantiningsih, Y., & Wicaksono, D. (2021). Schedule Planning and Maintenance Activities Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Boeing 737-500 Aircraft With Reliability Method. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Teknologi Dan Inovasi Indonesia (SENASTINDO), 3, 91 - 102. https://doi.org/10.54706/senastindo.v3.2021.130

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.